> I fear this as well. In fact, I'm relatively certain that they /do/
> both use the same PCI ID. Hence why lspci lists KT133/KM133. But I
> hope to big mistaken. If not, the only way I can see of detecting that
> it is a KM133 is by checking what device 01:00 is an S3 ProSavage.
> Yuck.
Is it possible to identify the KT133/KM133 by the vendor string,
rather than the PCI ID? It's, erm, kinda ugly, but it might be
the cleanest way to do it if the PCI ID isn't unique.
-- #ozone/algorithm <ozone@algorithm.com.au> - trust.in.love.to.save - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/