I have tested the 2.4 version under varying loads for about 20 hours
now and it seems stabel, the 2.5 version just got a compiles & boots,
I don't really trust 2.5 in this stage..
The only real difference between the two patches is the use of Ingo
Molnar's mempool interface in the 2.5 version, this is needed to not
deadlock under extreme loads. If you want to have this with a 2.4-based
kernel you have to get a mempool backport from somewhere and just copy
lib/radix-tree.c from the 2.5 radix pagecache patch.
The patches are located at:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hch/patches/v2.4/2.4.19-pre4/linux-2.4.19-radixpagecache.patch.gz
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hch/patches/v2.4/2.4.19-pre4/linux-2.4.19-radixpagecache.patch.bz2
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hch/patches/v2.5/2.5.7/linux-2.5.7-radixpagecache.patch.gz
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hch/patches/v2.5/2.5.7/linux-2.5.7-radixpagecache.patch.bz2
Please give them some beating so I can declare them ready for 2.5 when
Linus is back from vacation..
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/