Re: [PATCH] 2.5.7 acct.c oops

[Bob Miller]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:34:49PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 16:26, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> 
> >   Please help my education... after looking at the code, I don't see why
> > the BUG_ON was removed rather than made dependent on SMP, assuming that
> > the BK comment and my hasty reading of code actually mean that it did work
> > for SMP.
> > 
> >   Is this a solid "can't happen" now and no test needed, or is a better
> > test in the works, or ???
> > 
> >   I didn't try to compile it, so there may be something I'm totally
> > missing.
> 
> While he could of wrapped the test dependent in #ifdef/#endif
> CONFIG_SMP, the test really is not overly needed.  It is more a result
> of the previous code, which Bob Miller himself fixed up and then much
> rewrote the locking for.
> 
> Since he recently did the cleanup (and even added that BUG_ON) I trust
> he knows if we can remove it.
> 
> 	Robert Love

As Robert has sermized...  When I did the cleanup I debated whether to put
the BUG_ON() in there in the first place.  I used it as an extra bit of
paranoia not knowing that it would not return correct results on a UP.

-- 
Bob Miller					Email: [e-mail]
Open Source Development Lab			Phone: [phone] Ext. 17