Re: fadvise syscall?

[Joel Becker]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:41:37PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> We don't need fadvise IMHO. That is what open(2) is for. The streaming 
> request you are asking for is just a normal open(2). It will do read ahead 
> which is perfect for streaming (of data size << RAM size in its current form).

	A quick real world example of where fadvise can work well.
Imagine a database appliction that doesn't use O_DIRECT (for whatever
reason, could even be that they don't trust the linux implementation yet
:-).  So, this database gets a query.  That query requires a full table
scan, so it calls fadvise(fd, F_SEQUENTIAL).  Then another query does
row-specific access, and caching helps.  So it wants to turn off
F_SEQUENTIAL.
	Other applications can use this sort of stuff.  DBM could, for
instance.  So might GIMP.  Etc.  Dynamic hints have real world
applications.

Joel

-- 

print STDOUT q
Just another Perl hacker,
unless $spring
	-Larry Wall

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			[e-mail]