Re: IBM x360 2.2.x boot failure, 2.4.9 works fine

Gordon J Lee (gordonl@world.std.com)
Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:53:23 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Problems using new Linux-2.4 bitkeeper repository."
Maybe in reply to: Gordon J Lee: "IBM x360 2.2.x boot failure, 2.4.9 works fine"

> > 2.4.18 shows two processors
> > 2.4.19-pre3 shows two processors
> > 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 shows four processors
>
> Great, thanks for testing. I'd recommend using this hardware :)

layer bug in /proc/cpuinfo, and that kernel versions previous to 2.4.19-pre3-ac1
can actually use all of the logical processors. Is this correct ?

If so, at which 2.4.x kernel did support for hyperthreading show up?

- GL

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Problems using new Linux-2.4 bitkeeper repository."
Maybe in reply to: Gordon J Lee: "IBM x360 2.2.x boot failure, 2.4.9 works fine"