Eeek, these machines are now in the wild? Didn't realize this :)
> Has anyone tried running Linux on one of these ?
Yes.
> I have tried a few versions and found:
>
> 2.2.18 fails in boot
> 2.2.20 fails in boot
> 2.2.21rc2 fails in boot
Ouch :(
> 2.4.9 works fine!
Glad to see this.
> I know the hardware is in good shape because a 2.4.9 kernel works
> fine on this machine. I have scoured the IBM site, linux-kernel,
> and Google for clues, but to no avail.
>
> The boot sequence failure under the 2.2.x versions that I tried is
> always the same, it fails to recognize the IDE and SCSI devices. From
> the messages, the system appears to be deaf to interrupts and so it
> cannot recognize its devices. Notable messages from the boot sequence
> that support this idea are:
I don't know if anyone ever tried a 2.2.x kernel on these boxes :)
Is there a reason you _really_ need a 2.2.x kernel for this machine?
You also might try a UP 2.2.x kernel on this box to see if the problem
is in the parsing of the APIC tables (as I think it is.)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/