> Does this mean umsdos can be layered atop of wider range of filesystems than
> just msdos? That would be cool.
Yes, but what's cool about it? If not for the fact that there are weird
setups that actually use umsdos (i.e. compatibility reasons), the best
way to deal with it would be rm -rf... If underlying filesystem has
normal semantics - you don't need anything, if it doesn't... I'd suggest
to use combination of tar(1) and ramfs. At least that way you get full
Unix semantics - no mess with rename breaking links, etc.
> Also, would it be possible to mount both underlying msdos fs and umsdos fs
> layered on top of it at the same time (on different mountpoints)?
No. That stuff is ugly as it is and trying to make it deal with unexpected
changes of underlying fs... <shudder>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/