Re: [patch] vmalloc_to_page() backport for 2.4

[Tigran Aivazian]

On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> (note, that despite me writing this email as @veritas.com we don't
> actually need this symbol to be _GPL but if I believe something is not

me switching "yes" and "no" again. I meant "we don't need this to be
_without_ _GPL", i.e. we are happy either way. It just doesn't seem right,
that is all.