Hi,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:21:34 +0100
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz> wrote:
> VIA is already OK, well, it has my name in it. :) AMD is now also (well,
> that one wasn't broken, just ugly), SiS is being revamped by Lionel
> Bouton (whom I'm trying to help as much as I can), so yes, PIIX would be
> next.
>
> PIIX and ICH are pretty crazy hardware from the design perspective, very
> legacy-bound back to the first Intel PIIX chip. And the driver for these
> in the kernel has similarly evolved following the hardware. However, it
> doesn't seem to be wrong at the first glance. Nevertheless, I'll take a
> look at it. Unfortunately, I don't have any Intel hardware at hand to
> test it with.
I have one Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) here and I can test it for you.
This machine isn't very important so it doesn't matter if some data gets shredded ;)
Just send me the patch when you've finished it.
Bye
--=.w+EkXN9yadg:Js
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE8jjB0e9FFpVVDScsRAq2/AKDyCo3u6LFW1jXoIs6SZxMhXJp49ACeJYEJ
qhdMVUxLPctDwRvI2R3yu8M=
=nu2D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.w+EkXN9yadg:Js--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/