Re: [PATCH] Support for assymmetric SMP

[Eric W. Biederman]

Andrea Arcangeli <[e-mail]> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:29:54AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > the only problem is if you happen to get the timer irq always in the
> > > same cpu for a few seconds, then the last_tsc_low will wrap around and
> > > gettimeofday will be wrong. And even if you snapshot the full 64bit of the
> > > tsc you'll run into some trouble if the timer irq will be delivered only
> > > to the same cpu for a long time (for example if you use irq bindings).
> > > you'd lose precision and you'll run into the measuration errors of
> > > fast_gettimeoffset_quotient. The right support for asynchronous TSC
> > > handling is a bit more complicated unfortunately.
> > 
> > If your APIC works, your CPUs should get the timer IRQs in alternating order.
> 
> Maybe I remeber wrong, but AFIK the io-apic isn't required to scale the
> irq load in alternating order, it is perfectly allowed to deliver the
> irq always to the same cpu for several seconds. I know the probability
> for that to happen is low but it can happen.

Actually I know of at least one dual P4 Xeon board where I haven't seen anything
except IPI go to the second cpu.

Eric