Re: [patch] My AMD IDE driver, v2.7

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:34:19 -0500


Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
>On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>You have convinced me that unconditional filtering is bad. But I still
>>think people should be provided the option to filter if they so desire.
>>
>
>Hey, choice is always good, except if it adds complexity.
>
>The problem with conditional filtering is that either it is a boot (or
>compile time) option, or it is a dynamic filter.
>
heh, I couldn't have given a better argument against a dynamic filter.

I was actually assuming the filter would be a compile-time option, for
security's sake. Boot-time option works too.

So, it sounds like you could be sold on an fixed-at-compile-time filter
that can be disabled at boot :) I know you don't like
fixed-at-compile-time as you mentioned, but it's my argument there is a
class of users that definitely do. MandrakeSoft would likely enable the
filter in the "secure" kernel and disable it in the "normal" kernel, for
example.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/