Re: [patch] My AMD IDE driver, v2.7

[Erik Andersen]

On Mon Mar 11, 2002 at 07:34:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Reason 1: Standard kernel convention.  In other ioctls, we check basic 
> arguments and return EINVAL when they are wrong, even for privieleged 
> ioctls.

I have no argument with basic command validation.  But take a
look at ide_cmd_type_parser(), for example.  Do we really need a
giant switch statement listing all the allowed commands, just so
we can throw back a IDE_DRIVE_TASK_INVALID to user-space if they
decide to send down some undocumeted firmware wiping commands?
Especially since that giant struct of allowed commands is
duplicated in ide_pre_handler_parser() and ide_handler_parser() 

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--