Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
Nikita Danilov (Nikita@Namesys.COM)
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:16:43 +0300
Hans Reiser writes:
> Steven Cole wrote:
>
> >On Monday 11 March 2002 09:08 am, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >Perhaps others whose VMS experience is more recent than mine can answer this question.
> >More generally, if the infrastructure for keeping file versions around is going
> >to be generated for other reasons, having the option to have file versions could
> >be useful for some people. I certainly remember people who loved that feature,
> >but I wasn't one of them.
> >
> >Steven
> >
> >
>
> I don't use CVS for most papers, proposals, etc,, that I write. If the
> version control was turned on with something like a chattr, I would use
> it, and emacs could get rid of that damned ~ file that clutters my ls
ls -B
> commands of what should be a listing of only my current version of my
> home directory without old versions of files being listed (the disk
> space I don't care about, it is the clutter that annoys.)
>
> Hans
>
Nikita.
> -
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/