Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the

Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 09:13:05 -0800 (PST)


On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Sean Hunter wrote:

> Excuse my stupidity, but would a patch that just adds Davide's macro and
> changes all instances of
>
> current->policy |= SCHED_YIELD;
> schedule();
>
> to yield() be acceptable? Is there more involved than that, because I am
> perfectly happy to create and submit such a patch.
>
> ...or am I just being dumb?

The purpose of the macro would be to create a compatibility layer to
1) cleanup 2.4.x code 2) facilitate o(1) sched integration

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/