Serial.c BUG 2.4.x-2.5x

[Roman Kurakin]

Hi,

    Who is responsible person for applying patches to main tree?

This time I decide to send 2.5.5 patch version:

--- serial-255.c    Thu Feb 28 19:24:47 2002
+++ ../serial-255.c    Wed Feb 20 05:10:59 2002
@@ -2084,7 +2084,6 @@
     unsigned int        i,change_irq,change_port;
     int             retval = 0;
     unsigned long        new_port;
-    unsigned long        new_mem;
 
     if (copy_from_user(&new_serial,new_info,sizeof(new_serial)))
         return -EFAULT;
@@ -2094,7 +2093,6 @@
     new_port = new_serial.port;
     if (HIGH_BITS_OFFSET)
         new_port += (unsigned long) new_serial.port_high << 
HIGH_BITS_OFFSET;
-    new_mem = new_serial.iomem_base;
 
     change_irq = new_serial.irq != state->irq;
     change_port = (new_port != ((int) state->port)) ||
@@ -2136,7 +2134,6 @@
         for (i = 0 ; i < NR_PORTS; i++)
             if ((state != &rs_table[i]) &&
                 (rs_table[i].port == new_port) &&
-                (rs_table[i].iomem_base == new_mem) &&
                 rs_table[i].type)
                 return -EADDRINUSE;
     }

-------- Original Message --------
 Subject: Serial.c Bug
 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:02:47 +0300
 From: Roman Kurakin <[e-mail]>
 To: [e-mail]

   I have found a bug. It is in support of serial cards which uses 
memory for
   I/O insted of ports. I made a patch for serial.c and fix one place, but
   probably the problem like this one could be somewhere else.
  
   If you try to use setserial with such cards you will get "Address in use"
   (-EADDRINUSE)
     
   Best regards,
                    Kurakin Roman

Best regards,
                        Roman Kurakin