Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree

dart (dart@windeath.2y.net)
Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:41:43 -0600


<massive snippage>

> That sounds very nice, but in practice it means it would never happen, and
> you know it.

Excuse me...I've been a lurker and sometimes tester since 2.0.*. I've
been working my way through man (3) to learn enough to submit a coherent
patch and I don't appreciate you telling me I can't do it. I've searched
your submissions to LKML and all I see are opinions, ie ==
!code_submitted.

> This process could take six months to a year, after which we can start the
> process with the scheduler.

Who exactly are "we" anyway? I know it's not me because I haven't
contributed DIDDLY for code just yet.

Just a note: CD Burner, Parport/ECP/EPP/Zip broken with 2.4.17, will try
2.4.19. 2.4.18 too ugly to test.

Apologies to the kernel-list, I usually try to limit my noise...

-- 
Dart

"I have studied many philosophers and many cats. The wisdom of cats is infinitely superior." -- Hippolyte Taine - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/