Re: low latency & preemtible kernels
george anzinger (george@mvista.com)
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:32:00 -0800
wwp wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> here's a newbie question:
> is it UNadvisable to apply both preempt-kernel-rml and low-latency patches
> over a 2.4.18 kernel?
>
> thanx in advance
>
> --
I believe that the preempt kernel patch or one related to it does the
low-latency stuff in a more economical way, i.e. takes advantage of the
preemption code to implement the low-latency stuff. See the lock-break
patch that rml has. It should be right next to the preempt patch.
--
George george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/