Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops
Steve Lord (lord@sgi.com)
25 Feb 2002 13:45:22 -0600
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 13:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Stephen Lord wrote:
> > 
> > Yep, bio just made it easier to get larger requests.
> > 
> 
> Which promptly go kersplat when you feed them into
> submit_bio():
> 
>      BUG_ON(bio_sectors(bio) > q->max_sectors);
> 
> Given that I'm hand-rolling a monster bio, I need to know
> when to wrap it up and send it off, to avoid creating a bio
> which is larger than the target device will accept.  I'm currently
> using the below patch.   Am I right that this is missing API
> functionality, or did I miss something?
> 
I don't run into that one, but probably because I limit xfs to
use BIO_MAX_SECTORS, take a look at ll_rw_kio to see how that
splits things up. This of course does not take into account
any further restriction in an underlying queue.
Steve
-- 
Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@sgi.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/