Re: linux kernel config converter

[Jeff Garzik]

Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > FWIW a much better transition path is very close to what your tool does,
> > and is a suggestion made by mec (kbuild maintainer) near the end of the
> > recent flamewar:  convert config.in files one at a time, like we did the
> > old makefiles.
> 
> That's possible, as soon as the menu information is added, both formats
> contain the same information, so a program with two parsers can handle
> both simultaneously.

yep

> > That would imply a rewrite of make [old]config, and an updating of make
> > menu|xconfig, to handle the new format...
> 
> I think we should just dump the old tools and implement a single config
> library, which exports an interface to access the config information.

I do not think we can -avoid- dumping scripts/Configure[1], replacing
the existing tools.  In that respect I agree with Eric and the others. 
So your proposition makes sense.  But the configuration language can and
should be migrated, IMO.

	Jeff

[1] Sure you could code a replacement parser in bash shell script.  But
that's just wanking, like a Georgia Tech professor of mine:  he
implemented a visual Towers of Hanoi solver in vi macros.  We all
thought it was cool but ultimately CS wanking of no real value :)

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "Why is it that attractive girls like you
Building 1024    |  always seem to have a boyfriend?"
MandrakeSoft     | "Because I'm a nympho that owns a brewery?"
                 |             - BBC TV show "Coupling"