Re: ioremap()/PCI sickness in 2.4.18-rc2 (FIXED ALMOST)

[Jeff V. Merkey]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:51:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> > regions of memory.  I would propose that the maintainer of
> > vmalloc.c look at using 48 bit PTE entries or some other solution
> > as a way to alloc larger virtual address frames when the system has
> > a lot of physical memory.  It's seems pretty lame to me for a machine
> > with 2 GB of physical memory not to have at lest 256 MB of address space
> > left over for address mapping.
> 
> Instead of constantly trying to map >32-bit addresses onto 32-bit
> processors, why not just get a 64-bit processor?
> 
> One constantly runs into limitations with highmem...
> 
> 	Jeff

Sigh .... I am only using 2 GB on a 4GB capable processor (actually 
a 64 GB capable processor).  Looks like a patch is needed.  Who is 
maintaining vmalloc.c at present so I know who to submit a patch 
to?

Jeff

> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Garzik      | "Why is it that attractive girls like you
> Building 1024    |  always seem to have a boyfriend?"
> MandrakeSoft     | "Because I'm a nympho that owns a brewery?"
>                  |             - BBC TV show "Coupling"
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/