> "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
>
>>The first thing I heard, from mec two years ago, was "the CML1 code
>>base is not salvageable". This was then and is now the unanimous opinion of
>>the kbuild team. Not just mine; in fact, they concluded it before
>>I entered the picture.
>>
>>I have seen nothing since to make me change that opinion.
>>
>
> So Alan Cox's opinion counts as nothing?
> mconfig counts as nothing?
Why mconfig is not in the kernel? who maintain mconfig?
Why the first maintainer of mconfig prefer CML2?
>
> I'm sure CML2 configurator is whiz-bang, but it needs to do basic stuff
> like having "make oldconfig" work exactly like it does in the current
> config system.
now CML2 oldconfig behave like actual code. I would say too much.
giacomo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/