Just checking - you realize that getting the super_block includes out of fs.h
is easy, right? In fact I already did it in my Unbork fs.h (1..4) set of
patches last month, at least I set a pattern using ext2 as an example, which
is trivially extended for al filesystems. Now, I'm just waiting for one of
two things to happen: Al to decide he's finished mucking around in there and
I can submit the patch to Linus, or Al will feel threatened again and submit
a similar patch to Linus. Either way we win, because the kernel gets better
right? (Except that the second scenerio creates considerably more friction
that necessary, as we saw last week.)
> [...]
>
> Is all this worth it ?
You bet it is, you are preaching to the choir.
> Take a look at the updated dependancy graph after the cleanups[2],
Oh I know all about it, because I first did a version of this for myself
almost a year ago, and the complilation speedup was *remarkable*. That's not
even the biggest thing, I just find it much easier to work with and feel
better about it when the kernel doesn't doesn't have its thumb tied to its
nose.
;-)
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/