Re: Continuing /dev/random problems with 2.4

[Ken Brownfield]

On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:40:35AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
[...]
| > Exhausting entropy to zero under high use is not uncommon (that is a
| > motivation for my netdev-random patch).  What boggles me is why it does
| > not regenerate?
[...]
| Anything that is meant to be a server really pretty much needs an
| enthropy generator these days.  We really should push vendors to
| provide it (together with serial console firmware and other "well,
| duh" things rackmount servers should have as a matter of course.)

Yes, in fact we do have entropy generators in some cases, especially on
Solaris.  I think this is a very good idea -- it would be extremely nice
to see this especially since SO much more is dependent upon entropy
these days.  More than about 7 years ago I would have thought entropy
was a nethack clone.

Of course, in my case deleting the /dev/random character node still
doesn't allow entropy to drain in (after at least a month) so I suspect
the kernel's entropy generation would be sufficient if it didn't
artificially stall or drain from within the kernel.

Thanks much,
-- 
Ken.
[e-mail]

| 
| 	-hpa
| -- 
| <[e-mail]> at work, <[e-mail]> in private!
| "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
| http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<[e-mail]>
| -
| To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
| the body of a message to [e-mail]
| More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/