Linus> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> It's still a question whether we'll want to use 128 as
>> the branch factor or another number ... but I'm sure
>> somebody will figure that out (and it can be changed
>> later, it's just one define).
Linus> Actually, I think the big question is whether somebody is willing to clean
Linus> up and fix the "move_from_swap_cache()" issue with block_flushpage.
Ah, almost forgot it. The patch removes ``next_hash'' and
``pprev_hash'' from ``struct page'', which breaks ARM and sparc64.
Regards,
-velco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/