Re: [PATCH] syscall latency improvement #1

[Robert Love]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 13:54, David Howells wrote:

> The attached patch does the following to 2.5.3-pre5:
> 
>  * consolidates various status items that are found in the lower reaches of
>    task_struct into one 32-bit word, thus allowing them to be tested
>    atomically without the need to disable interrupts in entry.S.
> 
>  * optimises the instructions in the system_call path in entry.S
> 
>  * frees up a hole in the bottom part of the task_struct (on the 1st cache
>    line).
> 
>  * improves base syscall latency by approximately 5.4% (dual PIII) or 3.6%
>    (dual Athlon) as measured by lmbench's "lat_syscall null" command against
>    the vanilla kernel.

Mmm, I like it.  Ingo Molnar talked to me about this (he wants such a
feature, too) earlier.  This is a real win.

This patch is beneficial to the kernel preemption patch.  I suspect
other future ideas could be added now without hurting the common case,
too.  I had planned to roll need_resched into our preemption counter,
and I probably still can even with only 1 byte.

Anyhow, I'm looking it over -- good code.

	Robert Love