Re: umounting

[Samuel Maftoul]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:42:33PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2002 09:06, Samuel Maftoul wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:01:44PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > When a second user comes and unmounts a disk, then the data are flushed
> > > > (the old data) and he gets a fs corruption, because the data were not
> > > > from his disk.
> > >
> > > No. The sbp2 driver should report a disk change. If such a thing happens,
> >
> > According to my log, sbp2 has an event, It does see the new disk as I
> > can mount it ( something bizarre: The first disk I plug, the sbp2 driver
> > tells me the vendor and model of the disk, but all other disk won't tell
> > me anything until I realod sbp2 module ( I think reloading is ok but not
> > tested
> 
> Do you use some kind of hotplugging script ?
yes, I use suse 7.2 with updated modutils and kernel to 2.4.17 ( from
unofficial suse rpm produced by suse ) and I'm using suse7.3's hotplug
with ieee1394.agent that I got through the hotplug cvs server
maybe to chemical :)

I think that anyway we should prevent this happens if it's possible.
( I didn't lost any data since I tested with some spare disk ).

I can also put a umount in my ieee1394.agent, I thought about it and
probably will do it.
> 
> 	Regards
> 		Oliver