> On 22 Jan 2002, Alex Romosan wrote:
>
> > Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> writes:
> >
> > > Well, here goes pre5.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > this patch seems to be generated against pre4, not 2.4.17. just a
> > heads up.
>
> Eeek. Right.
>
> I've just uploaded a new patch on top of the old one.
the two patches are not quite equivalent. if i now try to reverse the
patch i get two failures:
patching file net/ipv4/icmp.c
Hunk #3 FAILED at 495.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/icmp.c.rej
patching file net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
patching file net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
patching file net/ipv6/icmp.c
Unreversed patch detected! Ignore -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/ipv6/icmp.c.rej
patching file net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
i think i'll download a pristine 2.4.17 and start again.
--alex--
-- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/