Re: Why not "attach" patches?

[H. Peter Anvin]

Followup to:  <[e-mail]>
By author:    Daniel Phillips <[e-mail]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> Kmail's patch-mangling problems seem to be all gone in kmail 2.2+.  The only 
> thing to be careful about is that word wrap should be off.  Since I
> forgot to
> turn it off a couple of times I now leave it permanently off and turn it on 
> for individual mails as needed.
> 

The common ground most people seems to be able to accept is:

a. Go ahead and make patches as attachments, if your MUA makes it easier;
b. Be bloody certain they're text/plain attachments.

	-hpa
-- 
<[e-mail]> at work, <[e-mail]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<[e-mail]>