Re: int 0x40

Raman S (raman_s_@hotmail.com)
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:47:58 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: misconfiguration of ne.o module in 2.2.19 damaged hardware. Is it normal?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: kswapd kills linux box with kernel 2.4.17"
Maybe in reply to: Raman S: "int 0x40"

Yes, That was it, Thanks so much.....
Raman S
>The IRQ setup code is probably overwriting it. You'll need to make the
>code in i8259.c skip over vector 0x40 as well as SYSCALL_VECTOR (0x80).
>
>--
>
> Brian Gerst

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: misconfiguration of ne.o module in 2.2.19 damaged hardware. Is it normal?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: kswapd kills linux box with kernel 2.4.17"
Maybe in reply to: Raman S: "int 0x40"