> for me the same machine is rock solid with 2.4.5/8 (driver 0.9.14) but
> fails with 2.4.14/17 (driver 0.9.15-pre9)
Can you check if your 2.4.5/8 driver actually does 100bt-FD autonegotiation
correctly? I believe it was broken during that time, and fixed in 2.4.9.
It's possible that that may have something to do with the problem, but
it's a stretch...
It might also be interesting to see if the working driver still works
if you forward port it into 2.4.17....
Ben
>
> the failure is not at all traffic related, I have these boxes in
> production (only useing 3 of the 4 ports) with no problems at all, but on
> a box not connected to any network I can lock it up by just issuing an
> ifconfig.
>
> it's possible that it's a PCI problem (if so can we back off the timing to
> what worked?), but I would expect the problem to be more variable if that
> was the case.
>
> David Lang
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/