Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM

[Andrea Scrimieri]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Andrea Scrimieri wrote:
>
> > > 2) the interview was done quite informally on IRC, with me
> > >    replying in normal IRC style  ...  it appears however
> > >    that the sentence fragments were just cut'n'pasted
> > >    together into something gramatically dubious, this has
> > >    messed up the contents in some places ;)
> >
> > Rik, I asked you to choose between an email or IRC interview, you chose
> > IRC, so from that moment if you used an informal language, it was out
> > of my job. If you aren't able to take your responsabilities for your
> > actions or words,
>
> I'm willing to take full responsability for what I mean,
> not for other people's interpretations of my words.

For the last time, i didn't change the interview text or cut anything. If
you want to continue throwing shit to me because you are not responsible
of your words, please publish the logs.  I'm beginning to get tired of
sentences like: "That assumes it is my assertion, it appears the
journalist in question is missing a few lines from his IRC log though...".
That's not true.

If you saw some differences beetween my version an yours, why didn't you
tell me that? Maybe because in reality there were not? This controversy is
started almost 2 days after the publishing of the article. If lies or
inaccuracies would be written on it you'd have all the time you needed to
tell me. You started to affirm that there were cuts only after the first
Andrea's email. Please be fair and get your own resposibilities.

>
> It seems IRC isn't a good medium to do interviews so I
> won't do that again.

You chose IRC, I don't.

Regards,

Andrea