While looking into "postponed messages" folder I found this and
accidentally sent this.
Sorry.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Have you tried to use SWAP_SHIFT as 4 instead of 5 on a stock 2.4.2-ac5 to
> > > > > > see if the system still swaps out too much?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not yet, but will do.
> > >
> > > But what about swapping behaviour?
> > >
> > > It still swaps too much?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > (returning to study mode)
>
> Ok, I'm stupid. Changing SWAP_SHIFT will just balance the nr of tasks and
> the per-task nr of scanned pte's, but the not (roughly) the total nr of
> ptes scanned. I thought it would decrease the number of scanned ptes from
> 3% (which the current in -ac code does) to 0.3% (which Linus tree does) of
> the total ptes.
>
> The problem seems to be multiple users calling swap_out() with 3% of ptes
> being scanned. This will unmap ptes way too heavily for common workloads.
>
> Its magic number tuning.. but nothing better can be done for 2.4, I think.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/