I don't see this conflicting with what the lsm patch does (with the
minor exception of removing the capable() call.) How do you see a
conflict here?
This patch looks nice, I like it.
Yet another reason why we should have a bunch of the ramfs functions
exported for the rest of the kernel to use :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/