Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions.

[Richard B. Johnson]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Alan Cox wrote:
> > > What's the point of optimizing an IF to a cmov if I have
> > > to insert another IF to see if I can use cmov?
> > 
> > I've always wondered. Intel made the instruction optional yet there isnt
> > an obvious way to do runtime fixups on it
> 
> Yes there is -- emulation! :-)
> 

It's just as bad, probably worse! You trap on an invalid op-code. The
trap-handler checks the op-code and if it's emulated, it emulates it
and returns to the executing task. This takes many instruction cycles,
certainly more than `if(cmov) doit; else do_something_else;` --which,
itself, takes many more instruction cycles than cmov is supposed to
reduce. It's a no-win situation. The only way to win is a compile-time
choice. This means customizing for your CPU IFF it has the cmov
instruction.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson

Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).

    I was going to compile a list of innovations that could be
    attributed to Microsoft. Once I realized that Ctrl-Alt-Del
    was handled in the BIOS, I found that there aren't any.