Re: Why not "attach" patches?

[Christoph Rohland]

Hi Linus,

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Wrong.
> 
> If I get a patch in an attachment (other than a "Text/PLAIN" type
> attachment with no mangling and that pretty much all mail readers
> and all tools will see as a normal body),

So text/plain is ok for you? How about multiple cummulative patches
attached to one mail?

This is the case where I hate your strategy about attachments: You
want to have separate patches (what I clearly understand), but you do
not want attachments. That's fine most of the time as long as I send
it to you privately, but to public lists too many people miss the
important steps.

Greetings
		Christoph