Re: slowdown with new scheduler.

[Banai Zoltan]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:29:25PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On Mon Jan 14 2002, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> 
> > 2.4.18-pre3	 	    real    7m55.243s
> > 			    user    6m34.080s
> > 			    sys     0m27.610s
> > 
> > 2.4.18-pre+H7		    real    7m35.962s
> > 			    user    6m34.270s
> > 			    sys     0m27.700s
> > 
> > 2.4.18-pre3-ac2	    real    7m39.203s
> > 			    user    6m34.110s
> > 			    sys     0m28.740s
> > 
> 
> 2.4.18-pre3+H7+preempt-rml  real    6m58.983s
>  			    user    6m34.500s
>  			    sys     0m27.820s
> 
That sounds very good! But what about the VM code?
Is the VM in 2.4.18-pre3+H7 as good as in 2.4.18-pre2aa2?