Re: Any non-BS VM work queued for 2.5?

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (acme@conectiva.com.br)
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:04:52 -0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Any non-BS VM work queued for 2.5?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Any non-BS VM work queued for 2.5?"

Em Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:29:18PM +0000, Alan Cox escreveu:
> > Is this true? Judging by the ease with which AA's hackwork made it into
> > 2.4, I think we may all be, well, fucked.
>
> 2.4 is now in good hands. Now be careful before the sun comes up and you get
> turned to stone ;)

Oh, this has something to do with that "don't feed the..." thing?

;)

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Any non-BS VM work queued for 2.5?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Any non-BS VM work queued for 2.5?"