Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ...

Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:33:48 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Timothy Covell wrote:

> Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current Seti
> efficiency is 5.35 CpF. That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra Sparc IIi
> according to their stats. So, it would appear that being SMP is hurting my
> performance a bit. Unless that is that you meant to run a seti instance for
> each CPU? And this reminds me of how "make -j3 bzlilo" is slower than
> "make -j2 bzlilo".

make -j3 bzlilo
make bzlilo MAKE='make -j3'

See if it runs differently on your machine, mem size may matter.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/