Re: [PATCH] update: preemptive kernel for O(1) sched

Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
13 Jan 2002 18:48:17 -0500


On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 18:22, Dieter Nützel wrote:

> what about lock-break?
> I am running your former one as always with
> lock-break-rml-2.4.18-pre1-1.patch ...;-)

I haven't tested O(1) together with lock-break personally, yet, but I
have a confirmation of success from a couple of users. There are no
reasons it shouldn't work.

> Any success together with AA vm-22?

Again I don't have any personal tests. I do know, however, the Rik's
rmap VM works great.

I suspect Andrea's updated VM from -aa will work, but there may be other
parts of his patch (RCU) that are not preempt friendly.

> What about latencytest0.42-png for latency testing?

A good test.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/