Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:50:21 +0100
On January 13, 2002 02:41 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> [somebody wrote]
> > For a solution to latency concerns, I'd much prefer to lay a framework
> > down that provides a proper solution and then work on fine tuning the
> > kernel to get the desired latency out of it.
>
> As the low latency patch proves, the framework has always been there, the
> ll patches do the rest
For that matter, the -preempt patch proves that the framework has always -
i.e., since genesis of SMP - been there for a preemptible kernel.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/