Re: [Announcement] linux-2.0.40-rc1

David Weinehall (tao@acc.umu.se)
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 04:55:38 +0100


On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:28:51AM +0200, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> David Weinehall wrote:
> > Hence I'm declaring this the first release candidate for 2.0.40.
> > Try it out, please.
> >
> > 2.0.40-rc1
> [snip]
> > o Change array-size from 0 to 1 for (me)
> > two arrays in the symbol-table
> > in include/linux/module.h
>
> Please revert above change. It makes struct symbol_table.symbol[] one
> entry long, and effectively _kills_ module support.

Well, I don't really like the magic used in module.h one bit, but I'll
revert this for now.

Anyone who could comment on whether usage of [] instead of [0] would
be better? [0] seems to have been deprecated in later versions of gcc,
so there _has_ to be some legal way of expressing what the kernel wants
to do here.

/David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/