Re: [PATCH] Oops with eject and cdrom affects 2.4 & 2.5
Andreas Dilger (adilger@turbolabs.com)
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 02:32:43 -0700
On Jan 09, 2002 11:07 +0200, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Yes, just kill the printk instead.
>
> Here are patches for 2.5.2-pre10 and 2.4.18-pre2 respectively
>
> --- linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c.orig Wed Jan 9 10:18:40 2002
> +++ linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c Wed Jan 9 10:28:22 2002
> @@ -1398,11 +1398,8 @@
> ide_init_drive_cmd (&req);
> req.flags = REQ_PC;
> req.special = (char *) pc;
> - if (ide_do_drive_cmd (drive, &req, ide_wait)) {
> - printk("%s: do_drive_cmd returned stat=%02x,err=%02x\n",
> - drive->name, req.buffer[0], req.buffer[1]);
> - /* FIXME: we should probably abort/retry or something */
> - }
> + ide_do_drive_cmd (drive, &req, ide_wait);
> +
Hmm, it would appear that this patch is "losing information", about the
fact that there could be an error here, and the FIXME that it should be
retried. If anything, I would just remove the printk and leave the FIXME.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/