Re: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:49:56 -0200 (BRST)


On 8 Jan 2002, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> One way to do this would be to create a newbrk() syscall which takes a
> permission argument (for new pages.)

ITYM mmap(2)

Rik

-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/