Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17

[FD Cami]

Hi all

I'm joining the host of beta testers involved in that patch...

It's currently running on a production machine :
dual PII350 on ASUS P2B-DS
3 SCSI hard drives
512MB of RAM
3C905C
This is a network server running squid-cache www proxy with
a medium load (700 clients on a T3), mysqld, apache, proftpd.
kernel is stock 2.4.17 - and so far, so good.

Cheers,

François Cami

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
>>Ingo, looks true. A quick -D2?
>>
> 
> yep, Brian is right. I've uploaded -D2:
> 
>         http://redhat.com/~mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-O1-2.5.2-D2.patch
> 
> other changes:
> 
>  - make rt_priority 99 map to p->prio 0, rt_priority 0 map to p->prio 99.
> 
>  - display 'top' priorities correctly, 0-39 for normal processes, negative
>    values for RT tasks. (it works just fine it appears.) We did not use to
>    display the real priority of RT tasks, but now it's natural.
> 
> 
>>Oh, and please move console_init() back, other consoles (sparc?) may
>>depend on having PCI layers initialized.
>>
> 
> (doh, done too, fix is in -D2.)
> 
> 
>>Oh, and _I_ don't like "cpu()".  What's wrong with the already
>>existing "smp_processor_id()"?
>>
> 
> nothing serious, my main problem with it is that it's often too long for
> my 80 chars wide consoles, and it's also too long to type and i use it
> quite often in SMP code.
> 
> IIRC we had a 'hard_smp_processor_id()' initially, partly to make it
> harder to use it. (it was very slow because it did an APIC read). But
> these days smp_processor_id() is just as fast (or even faster) as
> 'current'. So i wanted to use cpu() in new code to make it easier to read
> and to make it more compact. But if this is a problem i can remove it.
> I've verified that there is no obvious namespace collisions.
> 
> (i've done a quick UP sanity compile + boot of 2.5.2-pre9 + D2, it all
> works as expected.)
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
>