Re: PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7)

[Daniel Phillips]

On January 8, 2002 12:48 am, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Moving the ext2 headers from include/linux to fs/ext2 is an interesting
> > feature of your patch, though it isn't essential to the idea you're
> > presenting.  But is there a good reason why ext2_fs_i.h and ext2_fs_sb.h
> > should remain separate from ext2_fs.h?  It looks like gratuitous
> > modularity to me.
> 
> apparently userspace includes them, which is the reason for the strange
> types.  good reason to continue to keep them separate.  That's also why
> my patch7 adds an ifdef __KERNEL__.

It's unnecessary for userspace to include those headers, they are 
kernel-private.

--
Daniel