Re: 2.4.17 usbnet usb.c: USB device not accepting new address

[Johannes Erdfelt]

On Mon, Jan 07, 2002, Jörn Nettingsmeier <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002, Pete Zaitcev <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > > >  kernel: usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=6 (error=-110)
> > >
> > > And your /proc/interrupts is ... ?
> > 
> > Almost definately > 0. He was getting hard CRC/Timeout's out of the HC.
> 
> before plugging the ipaq in again:
>   
>  19:     198150     198207   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci
> NMI:          0          0
> LOC:    2554011    2553990
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
> after plugging in: (doing `cat interrupts` continuously)
> 
>  19:     198178     198233   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci
> NMI:          0          0
> LOC:    2555170    2555148
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
>  19:     198187     198241   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci
> NMI:          0          0
> LOC:    2555323    2555301
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
>  19:     198192     198248   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci
> NMI:          0          0
> LOC:    2555437    2555416
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
>  19:     198194     198250   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci
> NMI:          0          0
> LOC:    2555515    2555494
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
> i just realized i might have an issue with shared irqs here. aic7xxx
> has my system disk, and eth0 is a realtek 8139too.o
> aic7xxx and usb are on-board, so there's nothing i can do against
> them sharing an interrupt. i might shuffle my nic around tomorrow,
> if you guys think that it makes a difference.

It shouldn't. It seems to be getting the interrupts correctly since we
saw the CRC/Timeo from the HC.

JE