(v)sscanf handles %i improperly (+patch)

[Vladimir Kondratiev]

Sorry for 2-nd posting, but I'm afraid 1-st one was lost. Or is the 
issue itself not relevant? Anyway,

I found (v)sscanf included in last kernels handles %i format improperly.
Currently, up to 2.4.17, %i is handled identical to %d. However,
accordingly to man for sscanf,

        i      Matches an  optionally  signed  integer;  the  next
               pointer  must  be a pointer to int.  The integer is
               read in base 16 if it begins with `0x' or `0X',  in
               base 8 if it begins with `0', and in base 10 other­
               wise.  Only characters that correspond to the  base
               are used.

Please, when replying, CC me: mailto:[e-mail]

Patch is quite small (against 2.4.17):

--- vsprintf.c.orig    Thu Oct 11 20:17:22 2001
+++ vsprintf.c    Tue Dec 25 23:29:31 2001
@@ -616,8 +616,9 @@
          case 'X':
              base = 16;
              break;
-        case 'd':
          case 'i':
+            base = 0; /* autodetect */
+        case 'd':
              is_sign = 1;
          case 'u':
              break;