Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel
Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:00:57 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Or we could just have a really _deep_ hierarchy, and put everything under
> > "linux/drivers/sound/..", but I'd rather break cleanly with the old.
>
> Christoph has an interesting point. Networking is
>
> net/[protocol]/
> drivers/net/[driver]
>
> so by that logic we'd have
>
> sound/soundcore.c
> sound/alsa/alsalibcode
> sound/oss/osscore
>
> sound/drivers/cardfoo.c
>
> which would also be much cleaner since the supporting crap would be seperate
> from the card drivers
I would certainly not oppose that. Look sane to me, although the question
then ends up being about "drivers/sound" or "sound/drivers" (the latter
has the advantage that it keeps sound together, the former is more
analogous to the "net" situation).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/