Re: [patch] 2.5.2 scheduler code for 2.4.18-pre1 ( was 2.5.2-pre performance degradation on an old 486 )
Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:32:56 +0100
On Sun, Jan 06 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > Davide,
> >
> > If this is caused by ISA bounce problems, then you should be able to
> > reproduce by doing something ala
> >
> > [ drivers/ide/ide-dma.c ]
> >
> > ide_toggle_bounce()
> > {
> > ...
> >
> > + addr = BLK_BOUNCE_ISA;
> > blk_queue_bounce_limit(&drive->queue, addr);
> > }
> >
> > pseudo-diff, just add the addr = line. Now compare performance with and
> > without your scheduler changes.
>
> I fail to understand where the scheduler code can influence this.
> There's basically nothing inside blk_queue_bounce_limit()
Eh of course not, no time will be spent inside blk_queue_bounce_limit. I
don't think you looked very long at this :-)
The point is that ISA bouncing will spend some time scheduling waiting
for available memory in the __GFP_DMA zone.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/