Re: [RFC] Unbork fs.h, 1 of 4

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:37:39 -0500

I share the opinion of a couple others, to use generic_ip and
generic_sbp. That's what they are there for.

May I suggest the course of action whereby you convert the code to use
ext2_sb(sb) and ext2_i(inode) first, without changing fs.h at all. That
lays the groundwork for arguing out the final solution, and the code is
much cleaner either way.

I have not seen anyone arguing -against- ext2_sb() and ext2_i()
cleanups... they seem to make the code obviously more clean.

After those cleanups go in, your further "unbork fs.h" patches will be
smaller and only show the core changes you are interested in.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Alternate titles for LOTR:
Building 1024    | Fast Times at Uruk-Hai
MandrakeSoft     | The Took, the Elf, His Daughter and Her Lover
                 | Samwise Gamgee: International Hobbit of Mystery
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/